阜新地區(qū)涉農職務犯罪調查報告(2011.12014.7)

1、 I 阜新地區(qū)涉農職務犯罪調查報告（ 阜新地區(qū)涉農職務犯罪調查報告（2011.1－2014.7） 中文摘要 我國是一個農業(yè)大國， “三農”問題對于國家經(jīng)濟發(fā)展和社會穩(wěn)定的基礎地位不可撼動。近年來，我國在統(tǒng)籌城鄉(xiāng)發(fā)展過程中，涉農資金投入日益增多，農業(yè)部門工作人員手中權力越來越大， 一定程度上為涉農職務犯罪提供了空間。 涉農職務犯罪制約農村發(fā)展、損害農民利益、有礙農村穩(wěn)定，危害結果顯而易見。遼寧省阜新市地處遼西，轄區(qū)共有農業(yè)人口約 105

2、 萬，耕地面積 564 萬畝，人均占有耕地 5.4 畝，人均占有土地及耕地面積均列全省第一位，以其為涉農職務犯罪情況的調查和研究對象，具有典型性和代表意義。為此，本文運用了調查法、個案研究法、經(jīng)驗總結法等研究方法，以阜新市檢察院 2011 年以來查辦涉農職務犯罪的司法實踐為研究對象， 分析涉農職務犯罪主要特點， 挖掘涉農職務犯罪的深層次原因， 并提出針對性的預防對策， 以有效遏制涉農職務犯罪的發(fā)生。全文共分為四章： 第一章主要介紹阜新市

3、查辦涉農職務犯罪的基本情況， 包括辦案總數(shù)， 涉案人員情況，案件類型等等。自 2011 年以來，截至 2014 年 7 月，阜新市檢察機關在三年半的時間里共立案偵查職務犯罪 237 件 415 人，其中查辦涉農職務犯罪84 件 157 人，分別占立案總數(shù)的 35.4%和 37.8%，挽回經(jīng)濟損失 274.61 萬元。 第二章歸納阜新市涉農職務犯罪的主要特點。通過對阜新市 2011 年 1 月—2014 年 7 月查辦的 84 件涉農職務

4、犯罪案件進行分析，總結出五個特點，即犯罪主體相對固定、犯罪所涉領域廣泛、犯意明確手段直接、共同犯罪情況突出、作案時間長且隱蔽。 第三章分析涉農職務犯罪產生的原因?？陀^上主要是由于農村權力相對集中、村級財務管理不規(guī)范、執(zhí)法打擊力度不足以及監(jiān)督制約不到位，主觀上與村干部素質不高、法律觀念淡薄、特權思想膨脹等因素有關。 第四章提出涉農職務犯罪的預防對策。主要是抓住涉農資金發(fā)放和項目監(jiān)管、惠農信息公開等關鍵環(huán)節(jié)搞好預防，加大打擊力度，同時要完善

5、相關立法，明確法律適用， 此外， 還要加強監(jiān)督制約， 落實對農村基層組織人員的警示教育。關鍵詞：涉農職務犯罪 特點 成因 預防對策 III 2011 to July, 2014, Fuxin Procuratorate filed and investigated 237 job-related cases involving 415 persons in total, including 84 agricultural job-rel

6、ated crimes involving 157 persons. They account for 35.4% and 37.8% of the total filed cases respectively. An economic loss of RMB 2.7461 million is recovered. Chapter II concludes the main characteristics of agricultur

7、al job-related crimes in Fuxin City. Through analysis on the 84 agricultural job-related crimes investigated during the period from January, 2011 to July, 2014, the author concludes five characteristics, i.e., comparativ

8、ely fixed crime subjects, wide crime involving field, explicit criminal intent and direct means, prominent joint crime as well as long crime time and hidden crime. Chapter III analyzes the reasons for agricultural job-r

9、elated crimes. Objectively, the reasons mainly include comparatively concentrated power in rural areas, non-standard financial management at village level, insufficient law enforcement and crime fighting strength as well

10、 as lacking of supervision and restriction; subjectively, the reasons are related to the factors such as the village cadres’ inferior quality, lacking of legal concept and expanded mentality of special privilege, etc. C

11、hapter IV proposes some countermeasures for preventing agricultural job-related crimes. The prevention should mainly be carried out in the key links of agricultural fund releasing and project supervision as well as publi

12、city of farmer-benefiting information etc. The crime fighting strength should be reinforced, the relevant legislation should be perfected in the mean time, and the law application should be defined. In addition, supervis